The Free Movement

The free movement of goods accross national
https://pixabay.com

Zamhari — The free movement of goods accross national borders has been a controversial issue, some people argue that it is necessary for economic growht, whilw the other claim that it damages local industries.

Lately, most of the people are getting news about free trade. The news suddenly popular in Indonesia plus the circulation of news about the free market in ASEAN will be opened. In Indonesia, most people believe the free market can bring many benefits. On the other hand, most societies argue that a free market will only hurt them.

Most people agree because the free market can increase the quantity of a local product. Not only that, most people also assume the free market can open opportunities for cooperation between countries. A country can earn foreign exchange through import duties of export and import. Moreover, countries will be encouraged to improve the quality and quality of local products to compete overseas.

On the other hand, there are many people assume that free trade can hinder and disrupt the economic stability of the country because it is too low quality also because the price is lower. Worse yet, if a country is not ready; the country will feel dependent on the developed countries regarding products. This is of course very harmful because of its position only as a consumer.

I prefer to disagree with free trade in which only the developed countries benefit. In my opinion, a country must have its own economic system to prosper its people. As has been done by the regent Kulonprogo, people there can only buy rice from farmers Kulonprogo. So even with other products. Thus, the sirkulation of money is very fast in kulonpprogo and the farmers are very prosperous.

So, the point is why I prefer to disagree with free trade because the existing rules only favor one of the countries. So, if there is a free market, the rules of our own and of course the pioneer in our own nation.

The One Most Important Solution of Traffic Congestion

The One Most Important Solution of Traffic Congestion
https://pixabay.com

Zamhari — Some people believe goverment should spent money on building train subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others that think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.

Discuss both views and give your opinion!

Today, traffic congestion becomes one of serious problems espesially in big cities. Most people have assume that the right solution is  to build  train and subway lines. On the other hand, many people  think that multipliying and extending the road is the right step.

This essay would discuss both views and followed my personal opinion.

Nowdays, traffic congestion becomes one of serious problems especially in big cities. Most  people have assume that the right solution is to build train train and subway lines. On the other hand, many people think that  multipliying and extending the road is the right step. This essay would discuss both views and followed my personal opinion.

Many people choose trains and subways because it can carry many passangers in very fast time. For example, in Singapore the subway lines can handle 8,9 million passangers per day at a speed of 90 KM/hours. This Singapore became a country free from traffic congestion.

Another opinion, many people prefer highway construction in order to freed  from traffic congestion. Trough such measures add public transport, private vehicle retrictions and apply high fees for taxes and parking. This solution proved successful in London.

In my opinion, the suitable solution for this problem is the construction of the subway lines as a developing country. It is difficult to limit the ownership of private vehicles. For example in Jakarta, until now does not free from traffic congestion  problems yet. So, choosing to build subway lines is an option because people can live effectively.

My conclusion, the problem of congestion does not a matter of being late for work or journey becomes saturated. Morever, the problem of congestion is a matter of salvation.

 

Should Girls and Boys Be Educated Separately?

Should Girls and Boys Be Educated Separately?
https://pixabay.com/

Zamhari — Some people argue that girl and boys should be educated separately, while other think that it is more advantageous for children to study at the some school.

What your opinion?

Education always show argue, not only about science, but also concerning method of study.  Mostly people have opinion that girl and boys must be educated separately. In the one hand, mostly people think that education for children is much wiser to applied. This essay would discuss that argument and followed by reasonable conclusion.

The main causes this argueis bad social interaction. Now, public know that much social problem show because almost all school apply rule girl and boys study at the same school. For example in Indonesia, a part of student execute free sex, lower status and much wrong association.

Finally, the result of education is not money, career or high score. Somehow, the result of education is good interaction in society. So, the idea about separately education between girl and boys is suitable solution. Let are students walk on process step by steps became good student.

How to Get Family Closer?

How to Get Family Closer?
https://pixabay.com

Zamhari — Nowdays, families are not as close as they used to be. What do you think are the causes of family what can be done to make familier closer?

The families is one of pillar state development. But now, mostly families incline ignore that things. The result, mostly families are not as close as they used to be. Because of that, this essay is written for give that argument and followed by reasonable conclusion.

The main causes this phenomenon is job. My opinion, this conditions is happed because the parents have a lot of job. They taje for that with electronic gadget. Everyone consider that wreathe with families do not must be meet. In the one hand, perhaps many parents work for complete daily necessary.

For example, tehere is ostly people go to in abroad for looking money. They go to in abroad usually for work during two until ten years. So, although so far, the communication via electronic gadget keep u saved.

The suitable solution for the families are not as close as is have skill to work. If they have skill, maybe will be freelancer. One of benefits became freelancer, they will have much freetime. The finally, the families can to fall in house.

Basically, the good family is care with father to mother, sister to daughter, son to brother and other near families. So, the another care and share is one of things that must be applied everywhere, everytime because care and share can increase hope of life.

Do you Choose Traditional Learning or e-Learning?

Do you Choose Traditional Learning or e-Learning
https://pixabay.com

Zamhari — Online education is becoming more and more popular some people claim that e-learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education soon. Others sat that traditional education is irreplaceable.

Discuss both views and give your opinion!

Education is one of solutions for increase safety. In this periode, mostly people can get education not only by traditional, but also by modern education like learning with video call, youtube, a website and the other online media. This essay would discuss that comparison and followed by my personal opinion.

Electronic learning (e-learning0 is one of education method in the world. E-learning begin popular since emerge many kinds social media which is not needs face to face for study. Many benefits can be get with this method such as do not need meet, time for study is very flexible, and everyone can manage their own schedule itself.

On the other hand, mostly people have views that although e-learning quickly develop, they believe that traditional education still be used until forever. That things happen because it is one of main education. This methodhas benefits like everybody can communic ate directly with their teacher. The result, students can consult about their lesson which is less understood.

From discussion both views above, I incline choose the second method. In my opinion, I mind the second method (traditional education) is better than e-learning because traditional education has real place for study. Bot only that, there is traditional education make transparent about all management study. So, if each student has problem can be finished, different with e-learning which will cause much miscommunication.

The conclusion, this essay argue that existence of e-learning used for bussines. Somehow, e-learning we should eliminating from economic importance. So, for save education quality, traditional education must used forever, whereas e-learning for lesson extra curricular.

The Importance of a Minority Community For Immigrants

The Importance of a Minority Community For Immigrants
https://pixabay.com

Zamhari — Some people claim that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country while others  think that they can establish  a minority community instead.

Discuss both views and give your opinion!

For safety,  some people need move to the other country. The various purposes like study or work make immigrant must still and saty in there for several years. In the one hand, mostly immigrant have suggestion for loyal with culture in countries with relates. But, the other hand some immigrant have idea for establish a minority community. This essay  would discuss both views and followed my personal opinion.

Everyone can not live without communication, and communication need interaction. Because of that, it is better  of many immigrant should adopt with new culturein order to have large knowledge. That things execute in order to everyone can wreathe good communication.

In the other hand, mostly people prefer to establish minority community than adopt with new culture. They have much reason that they will be easier if problem happen. They have think that their associate will save them, whereas they are not sure yet.

In my opinion, all immigrant to obey new culture. The obey do not must agree with all things new culture. That things is executed in order to each people another differential and prevent. Socialgap for simple example in Jogja, one of person get in front of when bought gasoline. A woman get bully in social media because revolt typical culture in Jogja. The example above give signal that obey the local culture is very important more than for immigrant across country to country.

Finally, obey with all local culture is requirement for new immigrant to live in different place in order to compare persepsion. If the persepsion already same, the new immigrant can establish minority community. So, the existence of minority community not for enfeeble, nevertheless for strengthen it.